Should you play the London System? Setup, costs, and a faster way to learn it

6 min read

The London System is the most popular opening on the internet right now, and the pitch is irresistible: play the same six moves against almost anything Black does, and never study opening theory again. That pitch is about eighty percent true. Here is the honest version, including the part nobody puts in the thumbnail.

What the London System is (the short version)

It's 1.d4 followed by 2.Bf4. That's it. You put a pawn in the centre, you develop your dark-squared bishop OUTSIDE the pawn chain before you play e3, and then you build the same little fortress every game. The whole idea is that you get your bishop to a good square first, because once you play e3 that bishop is stuck behind its own pawns forever. Every London player has made that mistake once.

Your first six moves

1.d4 (centre). 2.Bf4 (bishop out BEFORE e3). 3.e3 (now the pawn, supporting d4). 4.Nf3 (control e5). 5.Bd3 (the other bishop, aiming at h7). 6.c3 (a quiet pawn that keeps d4 solid). Then Nbd2, and castle. That is a complete, sound, developed position you can reach in almost every game, and you can play it without knowing a single line of theory.

Why beginners love it, and why they're right

Because the alternative is worse. A beginner playing 1.e4 walks into the Sicilian, the French, the Caro-Kann, the Scandinavian and the Pirc, and gets punished in five different ways before they've learned any of them. The London player gets one setup, plays it three hundred times, and starts to actually understand the resulting positions. That's not lazy. That's how you learn anything: repetition until the pattern is yours. Ninety percent of your losses under 1500 come from hanging pieces and missed tactics, not from your opening choice.

What it actually costs you

Here's the part the hype skips. The London is safe, not dangerous. You will reach move ten with a perfectly fine position and absolutely no advantage, and then you have to actually outplay someone. It does not win games for you; it declines to lose them early. If you're the kind of player who wants a kill by move fifteen, you will find it boring, and bored players stop playing.

The second cost is subtler: it's so forgiving that it hides your weaknesses. You can play the London for a year, never learn what to do when the centre opens, and never find out, because your setup keeps rescuing you. The opening isn't teaching you chess. It's buying you time to learn chess somewhere else.

The trade you have to be ready for

After 1.d4 d5 2.Bf4 Nf6 3.e3 e6 4.Nf3, a lot of players meet Bd6, offering to trade off your beautiful bishop. Bxd6 is perfectly legal and perfectly fine, and beginners panic about it because that bishop was the whole point. It isn't. Take it, or drop back to Bg3 and keep it. Both are playable. The reason this feels like a crisis is that nobody explained the position to you, only the move order.

The check to run before you commit

Play ten London games and ask one question after each: did I lose because of the opening? Almost always the answer is no. You lost on move 24 to a fork you didn't see. If that's your answer too, the London is doing its job, and your real work is tactics, not theory. If instead you keep reaching move ten with no idea what the plan is, the problem isn't the opening either. It's that nobody's telling you WHY the moves are the moves.

That's the gap the Guru fills: he watches the position you're actually in and explains it in plain English while you play, so the London stops being six memorised moves and starts being a plan you understand. Walk the whole line with him, then play it against him and ask him why at any point.

Want the Guru to teach you this on a real board?

Learn this now →